BioIntel
Employers Celebrate Major PBM Reform But Face Complex Realities Ahead
Regulatory & Policy

Employers Celebrate Major PBM Reform But Face Complex Realities Ahead

Emily CarterEmily CarterFeb 8, 202610 min

Recent legislative and regulatory actions mark important steps in reforming pharmacy benefit management practices, crucial for employers managing prescription drug benefits. However, despite initial celebrations, the reforms fall short of addressing all employer concerns, notably failing to ban spread pricing, signaling that challenges remain in navigating the evolving PBM landscape.

Introduction

Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) play a pivotal role in managing drug benefits for employers, impacting drug pricing, benefit design, and overall healthcare costs. The passage of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2026 alongside proposed regulations from the Department of Labor represents a significant policy intervention aimed at addressing concerns raised by employers regarding PBM practices.

Overview of PBM Reforms

The new legislation and regulatory proposals focus on increasing transparency, improving regulatory oversight, and refining the relationship between employers and PBMs. Key provisions include enhanced disclosure requirements and stricter accountability mechanisms intended to curb practices considered detrimental to employers and plan members.

However, a notable omission in these reforms is the lack of a ban on spread pricing, a controversial practice wherein PBMs charge payers more than the amount reimbursed to pharmacies, profiting from the difference. Employers have long campaigned for prohibiting this practice due to its impact on cost predictability and fairness.

Initial Employer Reactions

The employer community has greeted the reforms with cautious optimism. The acknowledgment of issues in PBM operations and efforts to reform the system represent progress from an otherwise opaque and complex market segment. Employers appreciate increased transparency, which aids in better plan management and cost containment strategies.

Ongoing Challenges and Remaining Concerns

Despite the legislative advances, the absence of certain measures such as banning spread pricing leaves a critical gap. Employers continue to face challenges in fully understanding and managing PBM fees and rebate structures. The layered nature of PBM operations and contractual agreements complicates cost assessment and benefit optimization.

Moreover, the proposed changes require employers and their advisers to stay vigilant and adapt to the evolving regulatory environment. Compliance costs, operational adjustments, and continued negotiation with PBMs will be necessary to realize the potential benefits of reform.

Broader Impact on Healthcare Markets

PBM reforms are part of a wider effort to control drug prices and improve the efficiency of healthcare delivery. Successful reform could contribute to reducing prescription drug spending growth, enhancing access to necessary medications, and fostering a more sustainable healthcare ecosystem.

Conclusion

While the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2026 and the Department of Labor’s proposed rule signal important progress in PBM reform, the journey is far from complete. Employers must navigate a complex landscape where meaningful cost control and benefit transparency require ongoing engagement and advocacy. The path forward involves balancing regulatory improvements with practical implementation challenges to achieve the ultimate goals of fairness, transparency, and affordability in prescription drug benefits.


Source: MedCity News

Join the BioIntel newsletter

Get curated biotech intelligence across AI, industry, innovation, investment, medtech, and policy—delivered to your inbox.